Sunday, October 28, 2012

(i) Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print. (


How to write, read, and review as part of large science teams when millions of dollars are at stake? Writing and reviewing science projects for the National Aeronautical and Space Agency and the National Science Foundation, I came up with a list of 6 loose rules that make for good science proposal writing:
1. Think about your audience, as the message is conveyed best, if the reading is fun; 2. Avoid technical detail, cite the peer-reviewed paper instead; 3. Present and explain the big picture concisely and accurately in engaging ways; 4. Less is more. Focus on the why, not the how; 5. Avoid shady ambiguity, convoluted arguments, and incomplete explanations; 6. If it can’t be said simply, don’t say it.
(i) Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print. (ii) Never use a long word where a short one will do. (iii) If it is possible debbie macomber to cut a word out, always cut it out. (iv) Never use the passive where you can use the active. (v) Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. (vi) Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.
I read the essay in the spring of 1989 when I spent much time at sea with Richard Garvine. Rich was my PhD advisor and he probably suggested this essay to me, his German graduate student with poor writing skills. Rich taught me both science and writing. debbie macomber I miss him.
In particular a wonderful memory of his getting me in front of the Secretary General of the British Institute of Management; tea being served by a liveried debbie macomber flunky complete with white gloves; with Edward playfully kicking debbie macomber me in the ankle under the table to curb my obvious enthusiasm…
But to return to the subject debbie macomber at hand, as I see it, in one respect you are correct to point others towards the use of some rules of writing; “as debbie macomber part of large science teams …..” However, I also suspect that those of you that have worked so hard for so long to gain some understanding of the processes under way within debbie macomber the Arctic and Antarctic; are also having to come to terms with the even greater responsibility of widening the debate to the rest of the planet.
http://muenchow.cms.udel.edu Recent Posts Petermann and Ryder Glacier Ice Island Science Writing: George Orwell and Richard Garvine Petermann Glacier debbie macomber Shape and Melt Channels Arctic Sea Ice Cover and Extreme Weather Explained CCGS Henry Larsen: More on People, Places, debbie macomber and Services CCGS Henry Larsen: People, Places, Services Petermann Ice Island 2012 Breaking Up Ice Thickness in Nares Strait 2008 and 2009 Archive Select Month October 2012  (2) September 2012  (5) August 2012  (22) July 2012  (8) June 2012  (7)

May 2012  (3) February 2012  (1) January 2012  (7) December 2011  (1) November 2011  (1) September 2011  (4) August 2011  (6) July 2011  (4) Topics Select Category Global Warming  (14) Ice Arch  (6) Ice Cover  (12) Ice Island  (33) Nares Strait 2012  (22) Oceanography  (27) Petermann Glacier  (21) Polar Exploration  (19) Uncategorized  (3) Uncertainty  (3) Blogroll Arctic Sea Ice Dr. Johnson's (U. Oxford) Dr. Pielke, Jr. (Science, Innovation, Politics) Glacier's debbie macomber Perspectives physorg.com Real Climate Tamino's The New Republic Email Subscription


No comments:

Post a Comment